Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Amazing Boobzilla


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:46, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

The Amazing Boobzilla

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There is very little if any indication of notability. There appears to be very minor local coverage in Oklahoma, but there is no indication of national or international notability. I am One of Many (talk) 07:34, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete and I may've PRODed instead as this is clearly questionable for the applicable creative professionals notability, no convincing signs of independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  07:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment She's apparently been on Jerry Springer and AMC's "Freakshow", but I don't know if this really matters. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 12:47, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 14:03, 24 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:14, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I definitely want to see "more" of "the Boobzilla"...if you all know what I mean (wink*). But, until we actually see more about her on the Net, my vote is a delete. Antonio the Boobsupervisor Martin (dime) 06:51, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * Be a little careful about making off color jokes. Part of the reason for this is that if this gets deleted and it's contested at DRV, they could potentially say that the vote shouldn't be taken seriously or something along those lines. (And spammy articles like this tend to have people that make pretty heated restoration arguments.) The best defense against stuff like that is, unfortunately, to be a little careful. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:01, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Tokyo Girl! :) Antonio With a sense of Humo(u)r Martin (aqui) 11:46, March 2, 2016 (UTC)
 * No problem, just be careful. There are a lot of people who contest deletions with various allegations of the -isms and it can get really messy sometimes, especially if they decide to start talking about it on social media. I know you meant it as a joke, but you can't always predict that this will be read in the intended manner especially when it comes to article deletion. And I'm saying this as someone who has been accused of various prejudices for speedy deleting articles under basic deletion criteria like A7. It's not fun to deal with. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  08:50, 7 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete This reads like the sort of bio which performers supply to venues they're appearing at, for use in publicity for the show. The sources quoted are all local news sources and I can't find anything which suggests a wider notability. Neiltonks (talk) 13:34, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.