Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The American Assembly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kurykh (talk) 09:28, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

The American Assembly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I couldn't verify that this is notable. It exists and was started by Eisenhower, but that's it. Boleyn (talk) 17:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:27, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep popped right up on a gNews search of "American assembly" + columbia . Similar on JSTOR.  Just needs sourcing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC), Hi.  Maybe you want to click the link to JSTOR, perhaps think about withdrawing this AFD?E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:40, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)   References 
 * Keep. WP:BEFORE asks us to be sure to perform as the minimum search expected, a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search. The following is from the first few Gbooks hits, and I would say that there is plenty of good, independent, reliable sources without even diving into Google News and Google News archive searches. If nom should wish to withdraw, they may chose to follow WP:WDAFD and add   immediately below their nomination statement — Sam Sailor 01:58, 15 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.