Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Angela Test


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. references have been added showing notability &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:46, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

The Angela Test

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced track list Rathfelder (talk) 14:24, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iceland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:43, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:43, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Notable since it charted in Iceland, like I added to the article here. Unreferenced track list is not one of the reasons mentioned in Deletion policy.--Snaevar (talk) 11:51, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep because the article is no longer unreferenced. I've also found reviews on Pitchfork and MusicOMH. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:04, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep — has references now.  Laurel Wreath of Victors ‖ Speak 💬 ‖  22:26, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: At the time that I am writing this comment, there are only a few sources that support the commercial performance of this album. Is there more information about the actual album itself outside of the chart performance to represent that it has received more coverage? Aoba47 (talk) 20:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: The album has charted and some links were provided to show that this has been covered by outside sources. I think more sources should be added to this in the future, but I also believe that this article should be kept. Aoba47 (talk) 15:21, 20 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment. There's a bit more coverage here. At worst it should be merged to the band article. Given that the deletion rationale focused only on article quality I'm surprised this has stayed open so long. --Michig (talk) 08:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the response! Aoba47 (talk) 15:22, 20 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.