Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Angrez 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) -- Sam Sailor Talk! 02:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

The Angrez 2

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NFILM. No references. So obscure it's not even listed in imdb. ubiquity (talk) 14:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Objection withdrawn by proposer. ubiquity (talk) 14:37, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (quip)  @ 16:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (sing)  @ 16:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Alts...
 * WP:INDAFD: "The Angrez 2" "Kuntaa Nikkil"
 * WP:INDAFD: "The Angrez 2" "Kuntaa Nikkil"
 * WP:INDAFD: "The Angrez 2" "Kuntaa Nikkil"

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: For an Indian film to not be listed in IMDB means little, as many are not so listed and inclusion therein is no sign of notability. And obscure here does not mean obscure there. Expanding search parameters and using WP:INDAFD, We can see that the topic is not "obscure" there and thus not unsourcable.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:50, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   18:00, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak keep  Not to make too much of a point of it, as this sometimes happens with Indian films when nominators expect immediate perfection of new articles, but in a modified search parameter of "The Angrez sequel", I found a quite decent article on it in The Hindu, and then found it listed at IMDB.  We might reasonably expect it has more coverage not indexed by Google.  What you first found lacking, is now a suitable stub that can be expanded and improved as it gains more eyes. Thanks.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 12:10, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * At this point I'm ready to back off. When I did my own search for references, I saw this was not in imdb, but that the video was on youtube, and concluded (perhaps rather jumpily) that this was some fan version that was not really a professional effort. As the article stands now, it's rather better than most articles for new Indian films. ubiquity (talk) 14:37, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you, greatly appreciated.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 19:29, 12 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.