Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:55, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

The Antisocial Manifesto: A Bipolar Perspective on Dissent from Society

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Self Published website or book. No reference to demonstrate notability. Ariconte (talk) 02:46, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was unable to find anything to show that this newly released book is notable. The sources in the article are either primary sources or refer to things that the book discusses but does not actually refer to the book itself.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   05:47, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Essay hung on a title for a non-notable book. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:53, 22 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete pretty much per nom  Jay Jay What did I do? 03:33, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't meet WP:NBOOK, not notable. Looks like an attempt at self-promotion to me. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  10:20, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 01:55, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 01:55, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I thought advertising wasn't allowed on WP. That's all this is. The user is using social media to promote his publication as well. Indeed, that's the only place where you'll find the title other than this article and, of course, the user's website. Furthermore, a number of the social networking advertisements that he created seem to have been deleted already. What's holding us back?! Kelisi (talk) 01:39, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I'll further add that the user's username, "Bill Melahus", matches the book's "anonymous" writer's name exactly. You can't be a much more blatant self-promoter than that. Kelisi (talk) 01:46, 25 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete (speedy) Every second this article exists discredits Wikipedia.--I am One of Many (talk) 08:20, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.