Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Archers, A list of the Articles and Photographs that have appeared in the Radio Times since 1950


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete -- JForget 02:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

The Archers, A list of the Articles and Photographs that have appeared in the Radio Times since 1950

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A list meant to categorify... something. Violates WP:NOT. Kwsn  (Ni!)  03:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete: Good faith, but unneeded, listcruft. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 03:43, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unnecessary. Basically an index of appearances spanning 57 years. Have to congratulate the effort, but unfortunately it really doesn't belong here. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 04:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: This is definitely an indiscriminate collection (list) of information. Probably was good faith, but it isn't for WP. -  Rjd0060 (talk) 04:38, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * DeleteWIkipedia is not a directory, if this doesn't cover what is essentially an index for the Radio Times, it probably should. Iain99Balderdash and piffle 13:05, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Without the supporting articles, the list is useless. I don't know what the author is trying to say? Also WP is not a Directory. scope_creep (talk) 18:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per any of the above. Wrong place. Stifle (talk) 21:50, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:UNENC. An article such as The Archers in print (covering all printed media) might do as an alternative, but each individual entry would have to be verifiable and properly referenced for this to be of any use. A1octopus (talk) 18:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.