Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Armchair Historian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 04:00, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

The Armchair Historian

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBIO. No reliable sources listed other than YouTube and Twitter - both of which are not reliable. Only sources I could possibly find were the two articles by Forbes, which talks about another YouTube channel covering the similar subjects (and not reliable anyway due to WP:FORBESCON). No luck searching up his real name either. theinstantmatrix (talk) 13:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. theinstantmatrix (talk) 13:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. theinstantmatrix (talk) 13:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete I've seen similar discussions like this before (if I remember, the Canadian politics YouTuber J. J. McCullough is salted at every possible spelling of his name due to repeated creation) in which super fans have been able to make a rather lengthy video off WP:PRIMARY sources such as Q&A sessions and tweets. The only non-social sources I can find are the Gamer and History Net, of which I have no idea of the quality of the source. Amazingly, the second page of results of his real name instead yields "Griffin Johnson", who is apparently a TikTok star. There is no bias against "new media" in Wikipedia's guidelines, as we can find a million sources for PewDiePie or KSI, but not this guy. Unknown Temptation (talk) 14:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Barely found anything about him. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 15:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is supposed to be built on sources about a person, not a close watching of their youtube channel.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.