Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Artchive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. JohnCD (talk) 10:00, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

The Artchive

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Lacks notability, no references. Has carried notability and reference tags for over a year. Web search for reliable sources came up empty. Studerby (talk) 21:45, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I would have just prod'd it, but a previous prod was contested. Studerby (talk) 21:56, 4 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep — there are references (some now added) and this is a serious university-level art resource of international relevance. — Jonathan Bowen (talk) 20:04, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 5 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 11 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep with the added references. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:18, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Article does have significant coverage in more than one secondary verified source to satisfy WP:GNG ZachFoutre (talk) 13:30, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Struck per Articles for deletion/Birmingham Blue Coat School. Uncle G (talk) 14:48, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.