Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Artists Reserved Rights Transfer and Sale Agreement


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

The Artists Reserved Rights Transfer and Sale Agreement

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No real evidence that this contract is notable. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:48, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:56, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:56, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:23, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep subject of the article appears to be a very notable contract., if you had looked closely, there is no how you will not see New York Times,  A People's Art History of the United States: 250 Years of Activist written by Nicholas Lampert, Art of the Deal: Contemporary Art in a Global Financial Market -written by Noah Horowitz, this one in JSTOR, American Artist--Written by Ernest William Watson, The Deskbook of Art Law, Law, Ethics, and the Visual Arts to mention few. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 08:23, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:08, 26 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Not a perfect article, but I'm convinced of notability by the entry in the Guggenheim blog (which, in spite of being a blog post is an official publication of the G), which shows an archival copy of the agreement and says "it was adopted internationally and continues to be a standard artist agreement form today." LaMona (talk) 23:06, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep for now only if it can actually be improved as the current article is not what it could be. SwisterTwister   talk  06:33, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.