Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Assassination of Richard Nixon

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP following a rewrite (9 keep, 1 delete). Mgm|(talk) 09:11, Mar 15, 2005 (UTC)

The Assassination of Richard Nixon
Bordering on patent nonsense. RidG (talk)  00:40, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Well, it is the name of a movie, with Sean Penn I believe, so I'm sure it can be easily fixed. Adam Bishop 00:48, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Current content: "Richard Nixon was not assasinated. He died of a stroke on April 22, 1994". Since this is the title of a movie, the current content is irrelevant and could be speedy deleted. Or someone could fix it. Kappa 01:04, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep rewrite Kappa 09:40, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment I "fixed" it--well, made it into a stub about the movie, at least. Demi 02:03, 2005 Mar 9 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a notable film. Megan1967 03:34, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as edited. If a film has been released, it's notable. And even if it's soon to be released, it's often still notable. I've seen press about this movie already. 23skidoo 15:25, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep with edits by Demi. How is a movie with Sean Penn and Naomi Watts not notable? DaveTheRed 04:07, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Stong Keep. How Megan can vote delete for this yet keep on Honey Glaze is beyond me. Xezbeth  06:21, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Because I substantially expanded the Honey Glaze article. Would I vote against an article I put work into? Don't think so.. Megan1967 07:56, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Presumably people expand articles because they think they are worth keeping, not vice versa. -R. fiend 06:07, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Dude, Honey Glaze is by Michael Legge! The Michael Legge...need I say more? Anyway, keep this, as a film that by all indications passes wikipedia's very lax inclusion criteria for films. -R. fiend 06:52, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * As I've noted elsewhere, Megan likes to vote keep on articles that should be deleted and delete on articles that should be kept. Keep the rewrite. RickK 06:53, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep it civil please. Radiant! 09:18, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Civility still allows us to discuss other people's voting patterns. Kappa 09:40, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree with Kappa. And besides, asserting that a voter makes some apparently contradictory calls is not inherently uncivil. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  14:59, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up (Check your fiction) - this film is about a real 1974 assassination attempt. --iMb~Mw 06:29, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, as currently rewritten, as an article about an adequately notable film. -- Curps 07:08, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree, the current rewrite rules. Keep. Thanks, Demi.   &mdash; J I P | Talk 10:27, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Xezbeth did most of the work. Demi 16:23, 2005 Mar 9 (UTC)
 * Keep, thanks to the rewrite. Remes 14:47, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as rewritten. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 14:56, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Good save.  Edeans 17:58, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)