Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Association of Pennsylvania Municipal Management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 19:24, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

The Association of Pennsylvania Municipal Management

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I was actually going to PROD this but I wanted to let users comment. My searches found nothing convincing and good at all with the best here, here, here (11th from top, "Women Leaders in Bucks County, Pennsylvania: 27 Percent and Counting"), here and here (this last one probably has the most results but nothing significant). This organization is probably somewhat well known locally specifically for people from that field and such. It's worth noting User:Kinggeoian listed this as a possible article of improvement but they haven't been here for the past few years (so I doubt they'll be here to improve it) and there's no good move target so thus nothing to suggest keeping. SwisterTwister  talk  06:15, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:40, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 08:45, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ☮  JAaron95  Talk  18:17, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete not a directory. Prodding also lets people have a chance to see it--I am however not sure how many people check there--I do, but selectively. I doubt I would have deprodded this, but I do deprod 2 or 3 a day, often BLPprods for which the person is obviously notable and it is easy to find a ref.  DGG ( talk ) 01:54, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking in depth coverage in independent sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:38, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.