Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Aston Shuffle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 17:13, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

The Aston Shuffle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PRODed over a year ago and endorsed by an additional editor, was dePRODED (unnoticed) without addressing the notability issue. Many claims remain  unsourced and current  searches per WP:BEFORE still  fail  to  substantiate the claims and provide sufficient  WP:Reliable Sources to  assert notability  per WP:BAND. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:43, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I found a few pieces of coverage, and the four mix albums on EMI/Ministry of Sound are a strong indicator of notability. There's no obligation to address anything by the way when removing a PROD tag from an article. --Michig (talk) 16:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:15, 8 February 2013 (UTC) ~


 * Keep: Anyhow, the subject meets the requirements of the notability in some way. I have added and cited the few references, may those help to avoid the vote of deletion.Thanks.Justice007 (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TBrandley (what's up) 02:52, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

 Keep had an album in the Australia top 50 (source) and their ministry of sound stuff seems notable. Likely to be covered in hard copy magazines in addition to the triple J and in the mix stuff found on google news. The-Pope (talk) 14:48, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.