Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Australian Bar and Restaurant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 07:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

The Australian Bar and Restaurant

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD was declined, but I still don't see what makes it notable. It's a good restaurant that shows Australian sports. I am unable to find any 3rd party coverage beyond mentions of its existence. StarM 01:31, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 22 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Does not meet WP:N. After several source searches, I'm only finding this article which discusses Australians congregating there, but not much about the establishment itself, passing mentions (e.g., , ) and blog entries (e.g. ). NorthAmerica1000 07:20, 22 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak keep (maybe). I think the SMH source is pretty good and there are slightly-more-than-passing-mentions in articles like this. Tellingly, the venue has played host to "semi-official" events like this one. I don't know... the best arguments I could make would be on an "its interesting" or "I like it" basis.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 10:35, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 19:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - 3 sentences and 3 sources. One source is about Australian coffee shops in NY. One sentence (on menu) is not referenced and looks like publicity of a beer brand. I can't see much notability nor content around. It looks like if we don't accept the "menu" as a reliable source and add information from there, we don't have too much encyclopedic material either. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 19:57, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Struck comment above of blocked sock puppet, per WP:SOCKHELP. NorthAmerica1000 12:29, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.