Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Baby Sister


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 15:36, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

The Baby Sister

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No establishment of notability.  HurricaneFan 25  17:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 18:30, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment. This source appears to have significant coverage of the subject, and this one has two pages. It's more difficult to tell how extensive the coverage is here and here. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:17, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:55, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 10 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - In my judgement, the WP:NBOOK criteria are not met. With no intended disrespect to Phil Bridger, I consider the references above to be trivial in nature, i.e. not constituting "significant coverage that addresses the subject in detail". ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 13:28, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.