Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Balance of the Unverse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete --Salix alba (talk) 21:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

The Balance of the Unverse

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The misspelling of the article name notwithstanding, this seems to be entirely original research. No real citations, the author is merely espousing his own "scientific" opinions. Tanthalas39 (talk) 05:44, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete No references, not encyclopaedic and most likely utterly crap.  Man with one red shoe (talk) 08:21, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:11, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. Pete explains it all, but nobody understands it.  Scoff.  Scoff scoff.  Scoff. Mandsford (talk) 12:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I did a page move of the article to the correct title. I then came here to move this discussion.  I went back to the article to read it though before that and feel that the article is so ridiculous in its presumptuousness and so rife with WP:OR ("let's first discuss this..." and then "we can see together that..." .  Yikes.  I wish there was a speedy category for this.  Strong Delete.   Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  15:40, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom: gross NOR. —TreasuryTag talk contribs  17:28, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.