Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Battle Of Landcross Road


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedily Deleted (non-admin closure) by User:Parsecboy per CSD G3 as obvious vandalism. WilliamH (talk) 20:11, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

The Battle Of Landcross Road

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The article seems to be a rambly and self-contradictory anecdote, no sources are provided. Pseudomonas(talk) 15:05, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Fairly obvious hoax; the utter lack of ghits indicates that this isn't known by this name, at least.  I'm tempted to tag it for a G3 speedy.  (Pieces of it, especially toward the end, are almost definitely vandalism; they weren't in the original version, apparently.  If they aren't vandalism, then the hoax is far more obvious.)  Quite apart from that, I'd doubt the notability of cops busting up a party.   Anturiaethwr  Talk  15:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree - I'd have speedy-tagged it myself if it hadn't already been denied. Pseudomonas(talk) 15:44, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Obvious hoax. Razorflame 15:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Whats the criterion for a lame hoax article again?  coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  16:26, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as a blatant hoax. Nsk92 (talk) 16:40, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I just deleted this page as a speedy G3; the page was completely nonsensical vandalism. Parsecboy (talk) 19:12, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.