Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Battle of the Slopes


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui 雲 水 09:55, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

The Battle of the Slopes

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unnecessary fork from Battle of Dak To which says nothing more than what is already on that page Mztourist (talk) 07:03, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Nope, I'm adding considerably more detail, but given the article is less than 30 minutes old before this request for deletion was made. this is not nearly enough time. 07:18, 12 June 2018 (UTC)a_bicyclette


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Military-related deletion discussions. Mztourist (talk) 07:03, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:10, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:10, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:10, 12 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment -  Any update on this? Is the nomination still, in your opinions, valid/invalid? Smmurphy(Talk) 02:23, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I've added substantively more details and added different and newer sources. This is unnecessary as a request from User:Mztourist and just among one of his many censorship attempts he has launched against me. A bicyclette (talk) 02:33, 15 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep The Vietnam War (TV series) is an award winning documentary, and they had an episode that gave coverage to this battle. I see the article references it in various places already.  Seems to have enough reliable sources covering it to justify an article, so no sense deleting it or shifting it over to draft space.  Has expanded enough to justify a separate article.   D r e a m Focus  06:37, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - I'd prefer a bit more clarification from the nominator, but I agree that this seems like a valid fork at this point. Smmurphy(Talk) 07:15, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - The battle itself meets GNG. The question is whether it is a needed fork from Battle of Dak To. At the present state, it expands on what is in Battle of Dak To, and is a valid fork. I do suggest that a_bicyclette, when forking an article off an existing larger campaign/battle, develop the article a bit before main-spacing it - the initial version here (which was largely a copy) was "iffy" as a fork. Icewhiz (talk) 05:46, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep As a valid WP:SPINOFF article.  Hawkeye7   (discuss)  21:21, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.