Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bay of Noon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:59, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

The Bay of Noon

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete. Non-notable book. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 10:50, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Book by a notable author that was nominated for a well-known literary prize. Granted, the article should be expanded by someone who's read the book. Chrisbrl88 (talk) 11:14, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Another of her books has an article. Additionally, every other book shortlisted for the Lost Man Booker Prize has an article, with that as its main claim to fame. Ergo, we can assume both the author and the prize shortlist have both met notability standards, can we not? Grunners (talk) 11:55, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per, , , , and . Joe Chill (talk) 12:45, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:25, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Grahame (talk) 02:30, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per the very logical arguments supplied by Grunners. The book was shortlisted for the Booker Prize! -- Mattinbgn\talk 10:57, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources provided by Joe Chill. Being on the shortlist for the Man Booker Prize is also usually a pretty reliable indicator of notability!  Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:35, 27 May 2010 (UTC).
 * Keep per some well explained points from grunners and chill SatuSuro 04:27, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep While the article could use improvement, sources exist showing the subject is notable. Edward321 (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.