Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Beatles Complete On Ukulele


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Jayjg (talk) 01:30, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

The Beatles Complete On Ukulele

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable. Some third-party references, but several of them are non-notable (e.g. Blogspot blogs.) —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this music project. Joe Chill (talk) 00:35, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: ,,If and when it is notable ..we can re-make the article then...Buzzzsherman (talk) 01:04, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Surely articles in such major publications as Metro and the New York Post, as listed in the article, qualify as the "significant coverage" needed.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 01:25, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Some of the sources are blogs, but others, such as the NY Post article, are significant and appropriate to demonstrate notability. Rlendog (talk) 04:54, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - article needs work, but the NY Post article qualifies as significant coverage. Regards,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 12:00, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.