Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Beckham Catch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 03:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

The Beckham Catch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This catch does not have lasting notability. It was a great catch and maybe the catch of the 2014 season, but it did not change the outcome of the game or season. It does not have the notability of a play like Helmet Catch or The Catch (American football). Natg 19 (talk) 08:11, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Natg 19 (talk) 08:11, 25 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Utterly unremarkable doktorb wordsdeeds 08:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Time for the immaculate deletion. Great catch, but of no real significance. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:32, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete The only thing this early-game catch ended up saving was a few viewers from switching over to The Good Wife in the end since the Giants ended up losing. Great catch, but otherwise an otherwise unremarkable score.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 22:35, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Hell of catch, but not worth an article. If it would of happened towards the end of the game and was a game winning/tying touchdown, then yes keep. Overall lack of notability.--717 01:52, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 26 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - No indication of continuing coverage of subject play; the proper place for a mention is the team season article.  As noted by Clarityfiend above, this was no "Immaculate Reception."  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete to be sure, it was a great catch that generated a lot of buzz. However, I doubt that this will have any lasting notability. If it does, the article can be recreated. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 03:28, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Secondary sources can't exist yet (it just happened a few days ago), so it's not notable.  Nyttend (talk) 00:26, 3 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.