Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bengal Lancers!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 08:42, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

The Bengal Lancers!

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Really? an unmade film with one article about it. Slatersteven (talk) 15:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Slatersteven (talk) 15:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:55, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:55, 22 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - unreleased films can be notable but I'm not seeing any evidence that this one justifies an article Spiderone  18:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see notability around here. The Independent piece is great, and that's the only reliable source. IMDb and Youtube are not reliable of course, and the British Film Institute page is trivial. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 19:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I've added a few more pieces. I think with this cast and that director it is notable Dutchy85 (talk) 21:58, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Discuss If the "fraud" had more coverage it would be notable, I'm not sure I see notability yet, almost. 02:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * It starred some quite major names - Chris lee, Michael York, Trevor Howard - would that not qualify?Dutchy85 (talk) 01:04, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Dutchy85. To answer your question, no. Despite the well known names, notability isn't inherited and the article must stand on it's own...not by who is in it. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. Given the notable cast, the fact filming started and the controversy surrounding it, I think it's sufficiently notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * It has to be notable, in its own right (see WP:NRV).Slatersteven (talk) 14:14, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:57, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I am not seeing any notability here, but also I find it difficult to see how we can have a good article on a film that was abandoned during filming. --Bduke (talk) 08:28, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete An abandoned film, with no indication the film is notable. Jeepday (talk) 18:03, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per Spiderone and others.Nickm57 (talk) 02:10, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, sadly, since this is an interesting and well-written article. But the sources are pretty lacking, and it doesn't look like there is going to be more coverage anytime soon. jp×g 06:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.