Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Crunch in popular culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  07:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

The Big Crunch in popular culture

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The creator of this article apparently spun it off from Big Crunch. It's just one of those "popular culture" articles that we've come to know and love here at AFD. It's full of statements which are unsourced and uninformative. YechielMan 21:31, 18 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep or Delete and no merge. Don't care so long as the information doesn't get merged back in. - Francis Tyers · 22:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete with the rest of popular culture Alf Photoman  23:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * delete X in popular culture should not be automatically delible. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 00:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Should be part of an article on The Big Crunch.  Just one problem: what is it? --Dennisthe2 00:35, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Never mind on the question of what it is. Had i actually looked closer at Yechiel's nom above.... gonna do a redirect. =^^= --Dennisthe2 00:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete comprised of useless trivia ˉˉanetode╦╩ 01:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, typical indiscriminate list of "pop culture" trivia. — Krimpet (talk/review) 17:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete with no merge to Big Crunch per nom. Otto4711 20:17, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. If anyone wants to try to merge this stuff into a worthwhile article or section, it's there in the history of the Big Crunch page.  Mango juice talk 22:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, at least do not merge back. AFAICS leaf pages like this are the only practical tool to keep the main articles on topic and maintainable. I fully agree with nom's quality assesment but life is a compromise. Initiate a new Wikipedia-wide official policy that allows to remove all such references on the spot and I'll vote for it. Pavel Vozenilek 15:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.