Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Easy Jam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:53, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

The Big Easy Jam

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced, orphaned article, tagged for notability for 5 years. Boleyn (talk) 15:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 January 13.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  15:36, 13 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: I cannot find any hint on Google that this festival was ever very notable. And it also seems to be dead, so it doesn't seem like it will ever achieve notability. -- BenTels (talk) 15:50, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Glastonbury Festival (a brief mention would suffice). This at least confirms that it was part of the festival. --Michig (talk) 16:50, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 21:53, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 21:53, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 21:53, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:25, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 03:52, 27 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete who on earth thought that this was ever worth an article, its 100 percent delete and no redirect - there is no coverage nonsense  ferret  14:42, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, no redirect: Not even close to being notable. Toddst1 (talk) 14:47, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.