Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Five (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Kevin (talk) 08:29, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

The Big Five (band)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No indication of notability; no sources provided. Note: while this article would likely fail criteria for speedy deletion A7, I thought I'd give it a chance to be improved by using proposed deletion. However, the prod was declined with no improvements made to the article. older ≠ wiser 22:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Grahame (talk) 01:15, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:16, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Can find no evidence that this band even existed never mind determining notability. J04n(talk page) 00:41, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; WP:V and WP:N aren't met Nick-D (talk) 01:08, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:MUSIC / WP:N Orderinchaos 01:37, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.