Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Gay Musical


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:14, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

The Big Gay Musical

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No notability asserted. Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 06:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete solely because the film isn't out yet so fails CRYSTAL, not due to lack of notability. AnyPerson (talk) 06:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete as per User:AnyPerson Aurush kazeminitalk 06:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aurush kazemini (talk • contribs)
 * Delete Not sufficient information to support a standalone article. - Mgm|(talk) 09:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 11:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   —PC78 (talk) 16:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 17:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Editors please note that the article is going through expansion and sourcing to meet current concerns.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:46, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep as the film is most definitely not WP:CRYSTAL and the improved article NOW tickles past WP:NFF...  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Appears to now meet WP:N in the article itself. No reason for valid reason for deletion left.  Hobit (talk) 23:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Reply to self: Note WP:CRYSTAL says: "Individual scheduled or expected future events should only be included if the event is notable and almost certain to take place." This looks to fit the bill. 23:51, 21 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of LGBT related deletions. Outsider80(User0529) (talk) 23:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The producers here have a track record in the LGBT film fest circuit so even more sources will be forthcoming, as is article squeaks by and is NPOV written. -- Banj e  b oi   00:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.