Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Green Egg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep - nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Whpq (talk) 15:58, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

The Big Green Egg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Advertisement. I think I overreacted when I nominated this. Now I can't figure out how to take it back and just edit the article. Hotbioform (talk) 03:44, 11 May 2013 (UTC) Withdrawn by nominator Hotbioform (talk)

Creating deletion discussion for The Big Green Egg
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's notable; cursory search for sources turns up eg., , , , and many more. Being promotional in tone isn't a reason for deletion. DoctorKubla (talk) 06:46, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per DoctorKubla. If it's written like an advert, then it just needs rewriting, not deletion. Cream147 Shout at me 15:34, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per above.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 17:55, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Extremely well-known product with a passionate following and extensive coverage in independent sources.  The NY Times article cited by DoctorKubla makes the notability case clearly, and there's lots more like that visible at GNews, HighBeam, etc. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:35, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per above, and note that this is the only contribution that the nominator has ever made. Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 19:48, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - if it's notable but poorly written, it needs a rewrite, not a delete. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 19:50, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.