Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Idea (website)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:40, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

The Big Idea (website)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:WEBCRIT and WP:GNG. Only a primary source supplied. LibStar (talk) 22:45, 6 November 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting, already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:27, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Arts, Visual arts, Websites,  and New Zealand.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:57, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's a great website (I've used it as a resource for arts news etc) and I don't doubt it gets a lot of use, but I've been unable to find any significant coverage in reliable secondary sources, including through a search of the Australia & New Zealand Newsstream database. I found this press release published in the National Business Review and this 2010 magazine article profiling the creators but don't think these meet the test (former is not independent, latter not enough on its own). Chocmilk03 (talk) 08:11, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Honestly its a useful website but it certainty isn't notable enough for a Wikipedia page. `~HelpingWorld~` (👽🛸) 01:37, 16 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.