Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Lebowski in popular culture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 06:16, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

The Big Lebowski in popular culture

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

As much as I love the idea of two separate drinking games inspired by this film, this article is a directory of entries only loosely associated by the passing mention of The Big Lebowski. It is unsourced trivia, lacking secondary sources to establish its notability. It looks like it was moved from the main article, but really it should just be removed for lack of encyclopedic value. María ( críticame ) 14:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletions.   — María ( críticame ) 14:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletions.   — María ( críticame ) 14:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator's argument. Completely unsourced article pieced together by editors' firsthand observations, not to mention that the entries are not notable as a result of mentioning The Big Lebowski in passing or in some context.  It's just trivia. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 15:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Love the movie, hate Orig Research non-sense. Piperdown 16:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom & ample precedent. Carlossuarez46 17:13, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Irredeemable. Casperonline 18:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails per WP:V.--JForget 23:08, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete A movie is popular culture, so any other reference to it in popular culture is meaningless. Calgary 06:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Though the film was entertaining. Bulldog123 02:51, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Does anybody even try fixing articles before nominating them anymore? Why not try to find sources? Another example of an acceptable article topic that seems to have been hijacked by trivia lovers. --Hemlock Martinis 08:48, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I completely endorse this statement.  A  W  03:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, per Hemlock Martinis.  A  W  03:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.