Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Biggest Loser Australia: Singles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No quorum here. causa sui (talk) 17:13, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

The Biggest Loser Australia: Singles

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Future event, crystal-balling, no refs Pesky  ( talk  …stalk!) 12:37, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:40, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 20:40, 10 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: It is confirmed. SL93 (talk) 23:17, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Ok, so my understanding is that the whole reason this page is considered for deletion is because of a lack of references. There is no mirror balling and I apologise for the lack of references. I have now referenced everything which will hopefully clear everything up. There is no reason for its deletion. As SL93 states, this season is well and truly confirmed and even now has its own official web page discussing the new format. Bbmaniac (talk) 01:41, 11 September 2011 (UTC)  What are you talking about? How is information on the show's official site not a good enough reference? That's like saying information on YouTube's About Page about YouTube is invalid, which makes no sense. The other references come from TV Tonight, which if you didn't know, is a very reliable source of television information whereby the author of the blog has ties with Network Ten chief programmer David Mott (Don't believe me? Ask him). The blog post that is referenced references itself from the Network Ten PR detailing their program launch and info for returning shows. Unless it has been taken down, I did reference the page number in which information about TBLS is featured in the PR. I invite you to look for the document and read for yourself. Bbmaniac (talk) 06:45, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: Pending a reliable, independent source discussing this. So far all the sources which do are the show's own website and bloggers; none of these suffice to meet the GNG.  Ravenswing  10:54, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, causa sui (talk) 18:14, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Comment: Fixing the problem— WP:FIXTHEPROBLEM— is likely more appropriate than blanket deletion. Northamerica1000 (talk) 13:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply: That would be nice, but no one seems to have lifted a finger to do so, yourself included.  Ravenswing  01:20, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter  (talk)  20:28, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.