Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bipolar Advantage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  12:36, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

The Bipolar Advantage

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Declined prod. Self-published non-notable book. No discoverable independent reviews or citations. Fails WP:NBOOK. See also: Articles for deletion/Bipolar Advantage and Articles for deletion/Tom Wootton. &mdash; alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 04:59, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. The Chicago Tribune article is little more than a passing mention, and there's nothing else on Google to indicate notability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:08, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 20 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete for lack of charting and not meeting GNG.--Milowent • hasspoken 20:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.