Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Birmingham Stage Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:36, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

The Birmingham Stage Company

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sources. Coin945 (talk) 05:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 07:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. There are plenty of sources available. --Michig (talk) 09:29, 21 January 2018 (UTC) All these from The Stage for example. --Michig (talk) 12:17, 21 January 2018 (UTC) 806 exact title matches in Highbeam, 160 in the British Newspaper Archive. --Michig (talk) 12:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep -- review of Google books suggests that it's a notable stage company, sample:
 * Filming and Performing Renaissance History.
 * A long-running concerns; sources are available. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:14, 27 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment – A lot of the Horrible Histories related articles need merging or redirecting and I notice that many of the articles from Template:Horrible Histories that are currently nominated for deletion were created by Coin945, who is also the nominator in these AfDs. I'd suggest Coin945 WP:BOLDly merges and redirects the verifiable content to a parent article instead. Kb.au (talk) 06:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Nothing at AFD should be merged without a consensus Atlantic306 (talk) 19:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep as per the multiple sources identified above by Michig passes WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 19:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.