Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Black Album/Come On Feel the Dandy Warhols


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure). ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 14:58, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

The Black Album/Come On Feel the Dandy Warhols

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This has been deleted in the past - it is not notable. Lachlanusername (talk) 22:55, 4 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: To whom it may concern, I am the one who created this article. I don't believe this article was "deleted in the past" as this article discusses the official release of The Black Album, not the demo version which was never released. The article also discusses the album Come On Feel the Dandy Warhols which is the first official compilation released by the band. I hope that adds some clarification to any confusion surrounding said article. If not, please allow me to propose a serious question here and I would really like a qualified answer. How is this particular album allegedly "not notable" then, while The Dandy Warhols' other albums have apparently been deemed notable? -- Neuroticguru (talk) 02:47, 14 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 00:40, 5 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - This is a released album, and not a demo tape for a notable band with an extensive discography. As such, it makes no sense for an encyclopedia to have a hole in the discography coverage.  -- Whpq (talk) 16:21, 7 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - This album doesn't fit the criteria for 'Not notable', it was a fully released album and is included in the official discography of the band on their website. If this were to be deleted then there would be a good case to delete the individual entries for their other albums .--BloodlessVoid (talk) 17:52, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 23:40, 11 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per the reasons stated by others: it's an official album release by a solidly notable band, no reason to have a hole in the discography. --Arxiloxos (talk) 23:56, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.