Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Black Album/Come On Feel the Dandy Warhols (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Notable album by notable band. Previously nominated by same editor: so same result. Drmies (talk) 02:28, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

The Black Album/Come On Feel the Dandy Warhols
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article was deleted in the past as it was established as not notable. I was thinking of the separate articles for The Black Album and Come On Feel the Dandy Warhols which used to exist but have both been redirected to the artist discography page. Regardless, this double album has never been established as notable for inclusion on Wikipedia. LF (talk) 01:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. The nom is misleading. This article passed its last AfD with a "keep" result. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. This was kept at the first AfD just 3 months ago, for valid reasons, and no reason has been articulated to change that result. --Arxiloxos (talk) 05:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 16:54, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: Nomination is completely deceptive. I demand that the nominator explain themselves if they wish to ever edit Wikipedia again.  Was just kept at AfD 3 months ago, nomination makes no reference to this.--Milowent • hasspoken  12:54, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep: Being the creator of this article, I completely agree with the previous statements in favor of keeping this article. The nomination is completely misleading, as this article was never deleted in the past. It was up for a deletion vote back in November of 2011, but it ultimately passed at AfD with the result of "Keep". The nominator might be thinking of The Dandy Warhol's 1996 demo album which is also entitled "The Black Album". I believe that album did have a Wikipedia article which was deleted for being "not notable". Allow me to reiterate the fact that this article ("The Black Album/Come On Feel the Dandy Warhols") is not about the aforementioned 1996 demo album. This article is about an official, double album which was self-released by the band in 2004. If the album article is deleted, then there will be a hole in the discography of the band. As for the nominator's argument of, "No professional reviews by notable sources or inclusion on any major charts.": Even though those items are both nice and helpful, they are not required in order to start an album article on Wikipedia. Nominator, feel free to edit the article by adding those things if you wish, but the article doesn't need to be deleted because it lacks them. In the future, I would kindly suggest that you do a little research on an article before you nominate it for deletion. --Neuroticguru (talk) 20:16, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Notability (music), WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines. Kindly explain how it is notable. LF (talk) 00:18, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Same person (different user names) nominated article twice for deletion: To whom it may concern: After doing some research on the present deletion nominator (LF) of this article, I found that they are the same person (Lachlanusername) who nominated this article for deletion the first time around. You can see that the LF user page will redirect to the Lachlanusername user page. Lachlanusername, LF, or whatever you're calling yourself, you need to respect the decision to "Keep" this article! All present and past reasons to do so are absolutely valid and legitimate. I believe that what you are doing is considered vandalism by Wikipedia. In fact, I will be placing a "vandalism" template on your user page and contacting administration about your multiple account usage. Your use of multiple accounts in order "to reinforce your viewpoint is considered a serious breach of community trust." (See: Wikipedia policy on multiple accounts) I politely request that you cease and desist this behavior. --Neuroticguru (talk) 21:34, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Apology: To all involved, I let this second nomination for deletion get too personal and I apologize for acting in a rash manner. I was warned by administration as regarding my actions towards LF's user page and the "vandalism" template which I placed on it. That template was removed by me a short time ago. However, I still believe that LF and Lachlanusername are the same user. If I am wrong about that, then I sincerely apologize to LF. LF, you asked me how this album is notable, maybe it's not. If you really think about it, notability is completely subjective anyways. I understand that Wikipedia has its "guidelines" on such matters though. I just thought I'd make an article about this double album. I'm only marginally a fan of the band. I do own this album, but it's not on heavy rotation for me. Feel free to use this information however you'd like to. Neuroticguru (talk) 02:20, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.