Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Black Book (Rebus)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 15:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

The Black Book (Rebus)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Redirect to Rebus (TV series). This unsourced articled does not establish notability and contains information about the tv episode that is adequately summarized in the article about the tv series. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:18, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  M assiveYR   ♠  12:26, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages to be redirected to the same target for the same reason:




 * Well, I would oppose this, obviously; the reason I set these pages up in the first place was because I thought they were useful additions to the project.
 * The rationale for deletion is that the article “does not establish notability” and that the content is “adequately summarized” in the series article.
 * First, the notability guideline for television says that “an individual radio or television program is likely to be notable if it airs on a network of radio or television stations (either national or regional in scope), or on a cable television network with a national audience” The article already stated that it was made for STV when it was tagged for this, so it already met this requirement. All these episodes have been shown numerous times by STV, and ITV in England (on a continuous loop, it seemed, a few years ago), and more recently on Drama , as well as overseas.
 * Second, that they are adequately summarized in the series article. Well, I would expect that; the purpose of having episode pages is to extend the information on them beyond a summary, which they did when they were written. If the series page has more information now, the remedy would be to expand and improve the episode pages, not collapse them back down to the summaries. I would suggest that would be a better course of action, and also to create pages on the episodes that don't yet have them. Swanny18 (talk) 21:21, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
 * PS: I've just deleted the notability tag from the Black Books (Rebus) article, as it meets the criteria for the guideline linked. Swanny18 (talk) 23:42, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment, why is this and the others here for deletion, the nominator wants them redirected, this discussion should be closed and redirect discussion taken to the talkpage. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 04:48, 7 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:08, 14 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:41, 22 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.