Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Black Reckoning


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 21:04, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

The Black Reckoning

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable book. this Hollywood Reporter article is the only sort-of good source to support it. His other book, The Fire Chronicle also doesn't seem notable. Bbarmadillo (talk) 20:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:13, 2 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NBOOK criterion 1. I added a few reviews that I found of the book and its audiobook to the article. Fearstreetsaga (talk) 08:03, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:53, 3 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep per Fearstreetsaga's additions. Toughpigs (talk) 04:29, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep It certainly passes WP:GNG and it is a well notable novel. Abishe (talk) 12:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NBOOK. Props to for their improvements. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 14:43, 9 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.