Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Blonde with Bare Breasts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:37, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

The Blonde with Bare Breasts

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Recent movie with no evidence of notability. &mdash; RHaworth 06:00, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Even in the Netherlands alone it is daily shown in several movie theaters as feature film. See also --Patrick (talk) 06:21, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as article fails WP:N, there is no indication of notability. (Article contains only a plot section as content). Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  17:35, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes... it need expansion and sourcing if possible.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment As a French film with European release in France and the Netherlands, and apparently no English release (yet), we need to check non-English sources toward notability.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * French:
 * Dutch:


 * Delete without prejudice toward recreation when/if the film gets more coverage. New film.  French and Dutch release.  Non-English sources wil be required.  I improved the article some, expanding it... cleaning up style and format... adding some sources toward its production... but it's just not enough at the moment.  As its author feels it is or will be getting coverage in the Netherlands, I encourage it be returned to him with our thanks, and be userfied to User:Patrick/workspace/The Blonde with Bare Breasts for continued improvement.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 22:34, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep There is no requirement that citations be in English. It is sufficiently cited in French. Shii (tock) 05:15, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree fully, and stated the need for sources, even non-English ones, in my comment above.... and note, I am the person who added the French and Italian sources to the article in my expansion and cleanup. If someone comes up with more than I could find, I'd be exceedingly happy to reconsider.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:47, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep now, as it has crept over to notable. I found a decent Dutch review of the film and added it with a couple more sources.  I feel now that there is more available for further improvement. Will just take some digging.   Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:23, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Variety review has been added now as well.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:44, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: per Schmidt - Ret.Prof (talk) 04:14, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Notable and good C article.--SulmuesLet's talk 15:13, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.