Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Boy with a Thorn in His Side


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Davewild (talk) 08:43, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

The Boy with a Thorn in His Side

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No reliable sources available to indicate this film's notability. Mattg82 (talk) 00:33, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 07:23, 9 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep and fix per WP:NRVE. I sure wish the author had done more to expand and source this film's article through use of available sources. Background, Cast, Plot, and Recognition could easily be expanded and sourced through some quite decent sources, including significant coverge by BBC and Microfilmaker Magazine and to a lessor extent with the articles in Pulp Movies Movie Review Film and the assist of interviews of the filmmaker in Rouge Cinema Film Courage Budget Filmmaker and Making The Film. I'll have time tomorrow night to work on it myself. I'll report back.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 10:45, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 16 October 2011 (UTC)




 * Keep Appropriate article. SimpsonDG (talk) 01:19, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * How? Why? Simply linking to a policy, without explaining how it applies to this discussion, is not likely to be considered by an administrator in deciding how to close this discussion. Please see WP:JUSTAPOLICY for further explanation. First Light (talk) 01:45, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:31, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

 Keep Please don't relist this again.♦ Dr. Blofeld  11:36, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per Schmidt.--Milowent • hasspoken  06:08, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.