Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Breakable (Movie)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:51, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

The Breakable (Movie)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable film, no evidence of independent coverage in reliable sources. Prod removed by creator without any justification. Hqb (talk) 17:59, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete not even a real film, just school kids playing with a camcorder by the sound of it. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:58, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:11, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Who are you to decide what is and isn't a "Real Film", Andrew Lenahan? Go watch "Shooting at the Moon", a short film with an article, and tell me why it is more deserving of an article than The Breakable. What I mean is, the breakable is a film that challenges us to think about the definition of art and importance, and if you can't handle that, then maybe you're not ready for the internet age. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.29.113 (talk) 17:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Royal Oak High School, Delete as while it IS a real film, and while it may be respected in its area, it has not had distribution nor coverage, and so does not meet the requirements as set forth in WP:Notability (films).  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:02, 2 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete and oppose redirect. The film itself fails to meet notability criteria, and the article about this high school should not be a dumping ground for every school project that a student want to write about. -- Whpq (talk) 16:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Makes sense to me. Struck above and went with delete.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 00:43, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Not notable? How can you watch this and tell me its not notable. If this isn't notable by Wikipedia standards, than maybe you need to rethink your standards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.149.135.134 (talk) 04:35, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

I feel I should say "The Breakable" is more then just a school project. Because it wasn't. "The Breakable" is the point in time which the teens of Oak-Town(Royal Oak Area) could composed art that large amount of other teen could appreciated. I feel if you seen "The Breakable" you can have a strong argument about whether or not the film is "real". The film was actually Distributed also aired on television. Including poster, commercials, and premiers were invested into the "The Breakable" pre and post production. The Producers of the film took it seriously whether you believe it or not. However, no disrespect instead of trying to deface the art why not embrace it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.41.114.194 (talk) 07:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No one doubts the film exists. It is just that Wikipedia has general standards by which to measure sutitability for inclusion that have been arrived at after years of discussion. Please review WP:Notability (film). What we'll need for it to be considred for inclusion are reliable sources that speak about the film directely and in detail.  If it was aired on television, share a review. If it was written up in a newspaper, share the article. Help us help you save the film's article.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 05:52, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.