Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Breath of Life (band) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus to delete following relisting. The Bushranger One ping only 02:43, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

The Breath of Life (band)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

An administrator closed the first AfD discussion for this article as "no consensus" with the recommendation of an "extremely early renomination in case reliable sources don't get added to the article that prove notability". It has been exactly six months since the first AfD discussion for this article and, in that time, no new sources have been added. This band is insufficiently notable to justify an article on Wikipedia. Neelix (talk) 18:09, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 August 2.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  18:31, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:13, 3 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. I couldn't find much coverage beyond what was identified in the prior AfD, but the band have released at least seven albums, several on a label that may be a significant enough indie to pass WP:BAND criterion 5, and they are covered in Mick Mercer's book The Hex Files: The Goth Bible, which shows up in Google Books, but with insufficient preview to determine the amount of coverage. Undoubtedly the article lacks sources and there may not be enough out there to have a satisfactory article, but I would be hesitant about declaring the band to be not notable. Unless some sources can be found, however, I think we have to with Delete as nothing significant has come to light since the first AfD. --Michig (talk) 12:29, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 20:43, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 14:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: Mainly due to the utter lack of sources. However I don't think they have done anything notable as outlined in WP:BAND to deserve an article on WP, or at least there is no evidence to suggest that they have. Mattg82 (talk) 21:43, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BAND agree with above, no notability of the band, could not find any source for this worth saving.-- D Big X ray  22:17, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.