Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The British Aerosol Manufacturers' Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. SorryGuy Talk  06:40, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The British Aerosol Manufacturers&

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Nothing to assert notability per WP:ORG and a search doesn't return significant coverage. Travellingcari (talk) 16:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC) 
 * Weak delete. The coverage in google seems to be kind of trivial - I mean, there are mentions of it, and there are pdf files, but no third-party sources that address the subject in detail are cited in the article. I wouldn't speedily delete this though, and I think someone should take a closer look at the sources.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 17:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  18:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep if there's another source, to show that they are in fact the major national trade organisation in their industry. DGG (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I'd agree but I don't find anything. Even in the PR stuff, which I know doesn't meet RS, which would normally say "Person X was appointed to BAMA which is the king of the world since the day of the dinos..." doesn't. I just can't find any evidence that it's an industry leader. Even plain ghits don't appear to assert any industry importance. Travellingcari (talk) 21:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. I found a listing at http://www.cbidirectory.co.uk/search/company_search.php?Keywords=Aerosol&Submit=Search which identifies BAMA as a CBI member trade association. The National Aerosol Association (based in the United States) includes a link for BAMA and for other countries' aerosol trade associations at http://www.nationalaerosol.com/links.htm --Eastmain (talk) 21:46, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan (talk) 06:15, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep- significant organisation in the field of aerosol industry, particuarly in the UK Astrotrain (talk) 13:04, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment particuarly in the UK : Hardly surprising, given its name. Emeraude (talk) 14:14, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Genuinely seems to be the most notable organization in the British Aerosol industry. Usefully encyclopedic to anyone researching that field. I'd say that any genuine and legitimate national manufacturers' association is notable by definition. Something can be both notable and boring! Aardvarkvarkvark (talk) 15:24, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment While I agree that it could be considered notable if we could find sources that back up the above claims of 'signifcant organisation' and 'seems to be the most notable' I disagree with : Usefully encyclopedic to anyone researching that field. Have you read the article? There's no substance, it's essentially its mission statement. I know that's for WP:CLEANUP and not AfD but my issue with that is a lack of sources with which to make this encyclopedic. Travellingcari (talk) 15:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.