Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Broken Down Comforter Collection (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Courcelles 00:14, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

The Broken Down Comforter Collection
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to be notable, and is also a compilation of two EPs which already have their own Wikipedia pages currently. Lachlanusername (talk) 21:27, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 21:51, 1 August 2011 (UTC)


 * This should never have been listed at AFD. At most, you have a candidate for redirecting to Grandaddy discography, which should have been first attempted through normal editing.  On the merits, however, just because it's a compilation doesn't mean it shouldn't have a standalone article, and the norm is for albums of notable artists to have them.  I found a review of this compilation just from a quick Google search.  That review also notes that one of the two original EPs is "a rare vinyl-only EP of B-sides, and other detritus", which means that it likely had far less distribution and sales than this compilation, and it doesn't even have its own article on WP...  So I'm not seeing a valid deletion rationale here.  postdlf (talk) 23:20, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable band, album received significant coverage (there's also a review at Allmusic).--Michig (talk) 06:28, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 18:44, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge with all the other albums from this band. One review on a fan-site and a reference in NME doesn't make notability. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:44, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Who mentioned a fan-site?--Michig (talk) 06:59, 8 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 14:32, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cerejota (talk) 04:24, 17 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.