Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Business of Dying(Novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   nomination withdrawn. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 21:51, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

The Business of Dying(Novel)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable. Little to no context with only a plot summary. The Weak Willed 15:21, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Simon Kernick - but is the author notable? That is the question. --Triwbe (talk) 15:24, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  —Triwbe (talk) 16:53, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Incredibly weak keep. If the author is notable (if) then keep. I'm inclined to keep "firsts". Alan16 (talk) 20:10, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, I'd be good if someone added stuff on style or theme or critical response etc.. Then it goes from "incredibly weak" to "weak"... This all depends on the authors notability. Alan16 (talk) 20:12, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

I withdrawl this one as well The Weak Willed 13:52, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I did some work on it and added references. It meets Notability (books)'s "subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the book itself". --maclean 22:45, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article should be moved to The Business of Dying — the "(novel)" disambiguation is unnecessary. maclean 23:20, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.