Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bystander Theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Will userfy upon request. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:00, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

The Bystander Theory

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to fail WP:GNG SarahStierch (talk) 19:14, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  22:35, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  22:35, 11 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - This is obviously a real movie that is not a promotion, and this is a featured film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghostboy1997 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete per WP:NFF. Ansh666 00:53, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - the only coverage is the Lights, Camera, Austin piece.  -- Whpq (talk) 16:12, 12 June 2013 (UTC)




 * Incubate per WP:ATD, WP:PRESERVE, and WP:NFF. The film topic is not ready now, but as this is to release in 2013, we can place the article some place where it might benefit from collaborative editing until ready for a return to article space.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:38, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete or incubate. Regardless, it's not yet notable enough for article space.  Andrew327 20:54, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:HAMMER and WP:CRYSTAL, or incubate per MichaelQSchmidt's and Andrew's arguments. Bearian (talk) 18:11, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.