Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The CGM Project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:33, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

The CGM Project
Delete. A project which isn't even done, and possibly wouldn't be notable even if it were. This also flagrantly violates the crystal ball policy, and the article itself sucks. --maru (talk) contribs 04:31, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and pure promotion. Cantara 04:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Might be speedied. Simply treats wikipedia like a forum post. Metta Bubble 04:50, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete ridiculous --Grocer 05:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Planned project by a group of people named Krystatos, Gorkab, Look That, Lilice, Zaknafein, Tidus San, Mr Bob and Durendal? Non-notable crystal ball. Fan1967 05:30, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above -- Alpha269 14:54, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. -- S iva1979 Talk to me  15:05, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Someone will need to remove all the links that someone added to other pages to promote this future project.  -Quasipalm 20:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per well argued nomination. ε  γκυκλοπ  αίδεια  *  22:52, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. TheRealFennShysa 23:06, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. K1Bond007 02:30, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above--Vercalos 04:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a webhosting service. &mdash;A 06:38, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This submission is begging for deletion as a multiple violation of policy and guidelines.--DV8 2XL 23:34, 8 March 2006 (UTC)


 * DO NOT DELETE, what is with you all? You don't even take a look to the project and automatically want to suppress it? What's wrong with you all? This is no propaganda, there's another page which list all the movies with CGI and what else? You want to suppress it? You think I will gain something by writing it for Wiki? No! This is a fan project and a school one too! If you go on the listed links, you'll see a video of the presentation, which is in an amphitheatre of an university! And those who think my article is a crap or sucks, it would be VERY NICE to tell me WHY instead of criticizing it! Gorkab
 * I wish the project luck and I'd love to see it when it is done. However wikipedia is not a "working space." I'd recommend you look at this page: WP:NOT, it goes over what wikipedia is not ment to be used for. Let me know when it is finished and I'll help you make an article about it. &mdash;A 23:57, 8 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Ok, can I modify it to integrate it to the existant article "Timeline of CGI in film and television" ? Gorkab
 * If there is information missing from that article then by all means add it. However, your project isn't ready for Wikipedia yet, so please keep information about it off of all articles. &mdash;A 03:20, 11 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment from the closing admin: This article violates so many policies I didn't even know what to say in the delete summary to keep it short. To the creators of the project, I suggest: get your own website, put the development info there, get the thing done, then wait until it becomes famous, and then somebody will undoubtedly write about it in Wikipedia. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 14:33, 11 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.