Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Camel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirect to Camel. Good work on noticing the nihilartikel. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 03:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

The Camel
Likely a hoax. No Google results for "James Douglas Stettin" except this article. Thanks to User:A childish "got you!" for pointing this out in Nihilartikel.  SCH ZMO  ✍ 00:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep/confused why do you want to delete [Camel]? perhaps there is some vandalism going on here?? Perhaps somebody needs to be banned?--Nick Y. 00:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Perhaps someone needs to WP:AGF and check their page histories. This was a hijacked redir page that has already been moved back. BoojiBoy 00:18, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * It was not a redir page before. It was created as a hoax by a user with the page's creation as the only edit in their history. --Lambiam Talk 01:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 *  Speedy delete  we do not need to redirect "The camel" to "camel" and yes there was some dubious material there before. Shimgray may have acted in good faith but inappropriuately by redirecting. --Nick Y. 00:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * A redirect cannot be deleted on the AFD page. You need to go to RFD to do that. The only thing that can be deleted here is the main camel article. You may want to change your vote since it appears clear that this is not what you want done.67.71.77.145 01:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the confusion, I created this page before Shimgray redirected it to Camel. And I do not want to delete the new redirect.  SCH ZMO  ✍ 01:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Q So what are we discussing here, the prose poem article? It would be nice if people didn't put redirects in articles that are under AfD. ~ trialsanderrors 03:10, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, nomination withdrawn by nominator and nomination in the wrong place anyway. &mdash;  Ed Gl  03:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.