Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Camels


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Shimeru 08:32, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

The Camels

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Incomplete afd. Anon gave "see Notability (music)" as the nomination reason. I have no opinion. --- RockMFR 06:00, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. Doesn't look notable to me, though they mention getting some radio play and working on an obscure soundtrack. Needs sources. Bobanny 08:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any articles on these guys. They aren't even listed on AMG either. If there are published articles on them I'd reconsider. --W.marsh 13:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep seem to be reasonably well established and notable within their subgenre & area even if not to a wider audience. I've written plenty of articles on bands less notable than this which no-one's had a problem with. -  Irides centi  22:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * keep per User:Iridescenti - they would probably fail Notability (music), but I've always felt that the criterion there is too stringent and arbitrary. Notability (music) admits that it only lists rules of thumb, anyway. However, it really seems to fail WP:ATT and WP:V, and the article should certainly have been tagged for a major cleanup. I almost want to vote delete, but won't because to be fair you'd pretty much have to delete most other indie band articles. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 00:36, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * delete - Article fails WP:ATT and WP:V, no independent sources (ooh - a MySpace page!), and if you read the page history you see a user named TimtheCamel did all the editing. To me, this now smells like a vanity page slightly disguised to make it not read like a press kit. I'd happily change my vote if anyone proves notability, though. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 00:46, 31 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.