Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Case That Shook India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Multiple reviews of the work were found during the discussion. (non-admin closure) Enos733 (talk) 04:04, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

The Case That Shook India

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I have not managed to find a single substantial review, and so it likely fails WP:NBOOK. — kashmīrī  TALK  14:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:27, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —  kashmīrī  TALK  14:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. —  kashmīrī  TALK  14:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —  kashmīrī  TALK  14:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge a line into The Emergency (India). Not independently notable. BD2412  T 17:12, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge as a section in the author's page. Neither source in the article mentions the book at all, but there is some coverage (ProBono India, dubious looking journal, The Quint, India Today, Lawmatics, etc). If not notable enough for its own article, it seems like there's enough coverage to have more than a line in the general page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rusalkii (talk • contribs) 22:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Qualifies WP:NBOOK with at least two in-depth articles on the book., . Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:46, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep NB this is actually a 1978 text, the 2017/18 edition contains a new preface; review of the original 1978 publication. Passes NBOOK.


 * Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 10:02, 29 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.