Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cash Box Kings


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Mz7 (talk) 22:05, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

The Cash Box Kings

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NBAND - attempts to get through AfC by bombarding the draft with a list number of unreliable sources, medias releases, release notes and non-notable reviews failed but the author moved it into mainspace anyway. Please check sources before !voting. Flat Out (talk) 23:27, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 02:42, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep The sources used are reliable and independent of the subject. Several of them are published and unbiased reviews of the band's music. The band also does have notability, as it is signed to a major record label and has received awards for its music. Please reconsider accepting this article for publication. Tcobrin User:Tcobrin is the creator of this article. Disclosure added per WP:AFDFORMAT. — Preceding undated comment added 14:32, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 21:02, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Appear to meet WP:BAND based on the following sources:     Everymorning (talk) 21:19, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - passes WP:NBAND #1. What's wrong with the sources, Flat Out? Everymorning shows at least two lengthy critiques in printed newspapers. Music magazines and specialised music blogs are ok for bands (record reviews), who else would talk about music? Kraxler (talk) 00:54, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Enough reliable sources found in google search. - Variation 25.2 (talk) 16:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.