Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Casino Job


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Cirt (talk) 01:00, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

The Casino Job
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Related to this AfD. This is sort of a pre-emptive strike to prevent re-creation (something the article creator has done before). Therefore, I'm removing the prods and bumping this up to an AfD. From my prod: "No indication of notability." The article creator, Indie Movies, is constantly adding (and, in some cases, re-adding previously deleted) non-notable films and has been brought up on the conflict of interest noticeboard twice now (the latest showing that they may have an IP sockpuppet), bringing to light that every film is released by Maverick Entertainment Group. Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 21:11, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Sorry if I screwed up any coding. Twinkle fouled up the AfD and I had to copy-paste it from another AfD because I wasn't sure what would happen if I used Twinkle to nominate again. -- Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 21:19, 22 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. No sources to be found. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 01:15, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this film. Joe Chill (talk) 02:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NF. Johnuniq (talk) 03:17, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per coverage in Las Vegas Weekly, Review Journal 1, and Review Journal 2. Let's find some more.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:32, 24 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Note. This discussion was only listed today, as it was missed previously. --Taelus (talk) 22:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 17:22, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:14, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, MichaelQSchmidt's sources establish notability. Werner Heisenberg (talk) 02:51, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Schmidt's diffs. ArcAngel (talk) (review) 02:59, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, but trim down and add the proper sources. --Reinoutr (talk) 15:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep the sources look okay I guess, I'm willing to give this indie the benefit of the doubt. JBsupreme (talk) 18:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.