Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cat Who Went Bananas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Practically unanimous in favor of keep. (non-admin closure) TL &#124; The Legend  talk 03:55, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

The Cat Who Went Bananas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

trivial reviews; a separate article is not justified  DGG ( talk ) 23:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Pahiy (talk) 23:16, 15 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment - I don't disagree, but discarding the three RS reviews in the article (and there's also Booklist) throws a wrench in how a lot of the recent book AfDs have been handled. Caro7200 (talk) 23:42, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:NBOOK, theres already three reviews in the article, theres also a Booklist review, as brought out above, and one from Library Journal - here. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:31, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. 200 words in Kirkus, 200 more in PW, and 400 in the Bristol Herald Courier. Certainly more than passing mentions and more than sufficient for WP:NBOOK. (In fact, the critics are somewhat unkind to this entry in the series, calling it "a shadow of its former self" and saying "only Braun's most devoted fans will enjoy this.") pburka (talk) 22:32, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, per pburka. I've also added a couple more reviews to the section. Isabelle 🔔 15:48, 17 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.